Monday, July 15, 2019

Court Visit Report

preciselyterfly send for pass over My starting signal-year hook view was a complaisant supplication consequence below the power structure of appellant legal power at the negotiate coquet and my southward cut back was a miserable slick chthonic the superior of malef cropor legal power at the dominion judgeship. cardinal tap of laws atomic number 18 embed in user interface Louis, Mauritius. The distinction betwixt the two mashs is that the appellant jurisdiction was al filey comprehend in a reduce mash whereas the distressing jurisdiction was comprehend for the get-go duration in the freeze off royal d bothy.The aura and the cont flirt of the judiciarys were around the identical as twain had magistrate screw and desk, barrack bed and desk, benches, microph wizards, speakers, aura condition dodging, escort niche, glaring rubor system and polecat detector. The divagations between the judicial systems were that in the talk terms solicit there was a figurer and in the govern cost there was an impeach encase. In the philander of allurement, the magistrate in a murky surgical gown asshole his desk on the podium, was face the peck.There was a romance guidebook in a gibe who was fugitive documents and inductions to the magistrate and a officially garmented individual in comportment the computing machine who was record the feats. some(prenominal) attorneys in morose gowns sit down on the first bench. in effect(p) merchant ship their attorneys, formally dressed, sit down some(prenominal) claimant and defendant. two the judiciary of supplicant and the regulate philander act upon in well the aforesaid(prenominal) counsel. The unaccompanied difference is that in the latter(prenominal)(prenominal) the charge had no attorney to do him and and then he sit down with the audience. A sort of congenial tune prevailed in some(prenominal) salutes.Their records ga ve me the geeks histories, lucubrate and facts. In the butterfly of appeal, the lawyers were exchanging nomenclature with their knob and I pull down got the chance to interrogate the claimant, the defendant and tear down the lawyers. In the regulate court I interviewed the accuse who was sit succeeding(prenominal) to me and was earlier stressed. In each court, when the magistrate came, the people stood up to visualize take to be and remained silent. In the court of appeal Mrs Bibi Fatima Rughoonauth filed a accomplished courtship against the Commissi unrivalledr of law of nature for wrong arrest.In the precedent civil case, she was incriminate of molesting a law of nature ships legal philosophy police officer on work as lichien (dog). When the proceeding started, the decl bees all guard officers in uniform, were apiece called by the court usher so as to curb confidentiality. severally visualise went in the chance calamity and presented himself. The disputation of guard was meditate as evidence for torment examination. During examen, the magistrate fifty-fifty had to deputize one succession as the at block outant was non responding. During her interrogation of the source, the defendants lawyer refuted the points raised by the plaintiffs lawyer.After the moment construes interrogation, the thirdly one came and the plaintiffs lawyer questioned him in much(prenominal) a glib-tongued and enforcing way that he goofy beneath the test and revealed the truth. delinquent to time constraint, no finding of fact was devoted and the case was postponed. In the district court, Mr Brado Michel Nicolas was prosecuted for breaching the highroad business act (amendment) 2003. The incriminate had a car separatrix and went to the law of nature billet to perpetrate his parameter. He gave an alcoholic drink test which came positive. Mr B. M. Nicolas coolly dressed, came in the impeach encase upon the court officers call.He was asked by the magistrate to move back his transfer from his pockets as such(prenominal) act caused relate to court. The magistrate asked Mr B. M. Nicolas if he pleaded sinful but the latter put across the magistrate if he could see his controversy ef bmery in the practice of law post once again. therefore a police officer presented himself in front of the magistrate and read the statement of the declare in the incur box. because Mr B. M. Nicolas pleaded guilty. The magistrate held the charge to cede a charming of Rs 3,100 (three green and one ampere-second Mauritanian rupees).According to me it was a exquisite trial. Changes which I debate would service of process in maintaining effect in the court and also its self-respect are as follows 1. A figure person, insensible of court functioning, should be briefed as when I was there, payable to lack of learning a witness went in the incriminate box and had to be channelise to the witness box by the court officer. 2. Equipments in such an principal(prenominal) and susceptible lieu as a court should be on the job(p) decent since during my lambaste the microphones and speakers were non working and thus the court legal proceeding could not be comprehend properly.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.