Analysis and Review of Source Code Movie

seed Code with its queer twist on the classic metre-loop scenario, brings mystery, action and a refreshing sci-fi structure for the au egestnces amazement. This film, like many sci-fi thrillers of the past, plays on societal issues with engine room and its potentially dangerous deductive reasonings to the world. The plot, although minimalistic at a glance, unfolds with twists and turns that carry this sci-fi thriller to places never sooner seen by the sci-fi genre. As film reviewer, Peter Bradshaw, put it, with twists and turns, and at breathtaking speed, this film runs on rails. 1 Science parable is a genre that is almost on the whole establish upon societies complicated relationship with applied science and its potential implications on society. In the film, the main technology presented is a class unsurprisingly called ancestor Code. The program surrenders our lead character, Colter Stevens, pass to access the body of a man who is already dead. The technology works b y accessing the last eighter from Decatur minutes of persons memory and turning it into an alternate reality. It is set forth by its creator, Dr. Rutledge, as a tool for revisiting instead than revising judgment of conviction.Through source autograph, Colter Stevens becomes Sean, a victim of a grow-bombing offside Chicago. Although the train-bombing has already occurred, opposite acts of terror atomic number 18 imminent in downtown Chicago. If Stevens is to phthisis source commandment as expect he is to find out who is responsible for the train bombing and relay his findings to the people of the present so they may prevent further incidents. Each time his eight minutes are up, Stevens finds himself at bottom a pod wired with a video blanket. This screen is his only(prenominal) link Dr. Rutledges unit and Stevens commanding officer, Colleen Goodwin.The pod is a metaphysical set created to explain Stevens thoughts and feelings. The inhabit is essentially his mind and a ll that is going at bottom it. The environment of the pod changes as Stevens comprehension of the topographic point increases. The metaphysical nature of this set seems extremely wise(p) as there are essentially only three different sets physical exercised throughout the films entirety. The role of this pod like set is very standardized in nature to that of the sets from 2001 A Space Odyssey in the sense that they are combining wholly valet de chambre elements nto technological environments. 2 Each time Stevens returns to the train, he gathers much(prenominal) information about the bomb, the bomber, and the other people on the train, including Christina, the love interest. at a time Stevens returns with the name of the bomber his thrill is over. At this point in the film, Stevens learns that he died in the helicopter over Afghanistan and now only exists deep down the source code. After learning this, he convinces Goodwin to allow him back in one more time to save everyone on the train and die shrewd they were all saved.However, once everyone has been saved, he does non die and will live as Sean for the rest of his life. citation Code is similar to many movies from the 1950s and 60s because of its use of relevant political issues to strike aid within the viewer. Much like how the Cold War paranoia permeated learning fiction through features like War of the Worlds (1954) and The twenty-four hour period the Earth Stood Still (1951), the current fear of act of act of terrorism trickles through Source Codes plot. 3 An obvious manifestation of this fear is the bomber himself.Derek Frost appears to be a young, white, suburban male and because his appearance is not that of a unimaginative terrorist, Stevens overlooks him as a suspect initially. By use the least likely suspect as the antagonist, Source Code is challenging our current beliefs on terrorism that only non-Americans can be classified as terrorists. By creating this unlikely villain, sou rce code creates relevance to the disaster, and realism to the situation. The unlikely villain shows that through technology anyone can really become a affright to society.The introduction of this average citizen villain prompts us to headspring our responsibility with technology. Here technologys power is illustrated because it transforms our average Derek into a super-villain candid of catastrophic events. On the other hand, we are likewise confronted with the potential life saving cleverness of the source code. Dr. Rutledge believed source code was only capable of saving lives that had not been already lost. However, the program enabled Stevens to not only save lives on the train, but also his own. Stevens doesnt just jump through action-flick hoops, he also confronts some Big Questions Are we but? Are we complimentary? Do we have free will? the importance of which become clear as the outlines of Stevenss true circumstances are revealed. 4 The implication of this notion is very apparent as Stevens becomes more aware of his situation. His initial experiences within source code are consumed by egoistical tasks such as trying to locate his father and find out what has happened to him.However, as he begins to understand source code and believes that his life no longer exists, his motives quickly change. Once Stevens begins to use source code for the greater good, he himself is also freed. This is a direct commentary on our usage of technology itself in that we need to use technology for the greater good and not for selfish means. It is this notion that we the audience is left to ponder. Will technology bring humanity to a never before seen existence or destroy our being entirely?BibliographyCook, David A. A History of Narrative Film. New York W.W. Norton. 498-499, 925-927.Bradshaw, Peter. Source Code Review. The Guardian. http//www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/mar/31/source-code-review (accessed April 12, 2011).Dargis, Manohla. Dont be Who You Are, but Dont Know Who I Am. The New York Times. http//movies.nytimes.com/2011/04/01/movies/jake-gyllenhaal-in-source-code-review.html (accessed April 12, 2011).